STUDYING ISLAM

A short Understanding of Jihad

This is a Readers Article. The views, opinions and understanding expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect our own understanding on the issue. Any visitor, with a membership may write an article which would be posted on these pages.

JESUS OR MUHAMMAD? WHO ADVOCATED LIFE BY THE SWORD?

Its rather unfair that non-muslims will judge Muhammad by

comparing him to Jesus. It is often

said that Islam is a religion of the sword. However this is not true. The old

tribal ethic affected the Qura’nic message, but the new religion was the first

received by the Arab of Mecca. In an atmosphere of a cut-throat capitalism and

high finance, Muhammad did not have the same atmosphere as Paul and

Jesus had. Each religion of suffering adversity has its battles. Jesus and St.

Paul did not have to worry about the social and political order because it was

already setup for them. Indeed Paul’s long Missionary journeys would have been

impossible outside the pax of Romana and without his Roman citizenship. In

Arabia and unprotected man could be killed with impunity on the road. Eventually

Christianity felt that they did not have to create an entirely political order:

They simply baptised the old Roman

law and institutions. Politics, therefore, remained a separate sphere.

Sometimes we often forget that Jesus, unlike Muhammad had a

world at peace. Muhammad was born into the Bloodbath of Seventh Century Arabia

where old values were being radically undermined and nothing adequate had yet appeared

to take their place. Muhammad as well as the other Prophets had preached

social Justice. Neither Muhammad or Jesus advocated war. But both would have

given their life to Spread Allah’s deen.

JIHAD?

The Quran began to urge us Muslims to fight for our

Justice against those who oppress us. This would involve fighting and bloodshed.

The root word of Jihad (JHD) implies more than Holy War. It signifies a physical,

moral spiritual and intellectual effort. There are plenty of words in Arabic

denoting armed struggle, such as (harb) which means war, (sira’a) which means

combat, (ma’araka). which the Qur’an could have used if war was the intended

meaning of this struggle. Instead Jihad a richer word which has a range of

connotations. The Jihad is not even one of the five pillars of Islam. Jihad is a

moral, spiritual struggle to achieve excellence.

Jihad is not also valid without a state. Here are some Scholars on the subject:

“And the third category of collective duties is one in

which [the authority of] the State is a [necessary] condition; for example,

jihaad and the implementation of the law of punishments in Islam. (fiqhussunnah,

assayyidussaabiq; vol.3, page 30)

Writes Ghamidi about the reason for this opinion of Muslim scholars:

The reason for this [condition] is that without political sovereignty jihaad becomes

fasaad [disorder, chaos, anarchy, etc]. How is it

possible that a group which does not even have the right to award punishment to

a criminal should be given the right to wage war? (meezaan, qaanuune da`wat;

Urdu; page 35)

An explanation of this reason can be found in Islaahi’s da`wate diin or us kaa tariiqe kaar

(Urdu; Chapter 14, pages 241 and 242):

The first reason [for this condition] is that God Almighty

does not like the dissolution and disintegration of even an evil system until a

strong probability exists that those who are out to disintegrate the system will

provide people with an alternative and a righteous system. Anarchy and disorder

are unnatural conditions. In fact, they are so contrary to human nature that

even an unjust system is preferable to them….this confidence [that a group

will be able to harmonise a disintegrated system and integrate it into a united

whole] can be reposed in such a group only as has actually formed a political

government and has such control and

discipline within the confines of its authority that the group can be termed as

aljamaa`ah [the State, or the government]. Until a group

attains this position, it may strive [by religiously allowable means] to become

aljamaa`ah — and that endeavour would

be its jihaad for that time — but it does not have the right to wage an `armed’

jihaad.

The second reason is that the import of the power which a

group engaged in war gets over the life and property of human beings is so great

that sanction to wield this power cannot be

given to a group the control of whose leader over his followers is based merely

on his spiritual and religious influence on them [rather than being based on legal authority]. When the control of a

leader is based merely on his spiritual and religious influence, there is not

sufficient guarantee that the leader will be able to stop his followers from

fassad fil’ard [creating a situation of disorder, chaos, anarchy on the earth].

Therefore, a religious leader does not have the right to allow his

followers to take out their swords [that is to wage an armed struggle] merely on

the basis of his spiritual influence over them, for once the sword is unsheathed

there is great danger that it will not care for right and wrong and that those

who drew it will end up doing all [the wrong which] they had sought to end. Such

radical groups as desire revolution and the object of whom is nothing more than

disruption of the existing system and deposition of the ruling party to seize

power for themselves play such games — and they can, for in their eyes

disruption of a system is no calamity, nor is cruelty of any kind an evil.

Everything is right to them [ as long as it serves their purpose]. However, the

leaders of a just and righteous party must see whether they are in a position to

provide people with a system better than the one they seek to change and whether

they will be able to stop their followers from doing such wrong as they

themselves had sought to root out. If they are not in that position, then they

do not have the right to play games with the life and property of people on the

basis of their confidence in mere chances and to create greater disorder than

the one they had sought to end.”

Allah asks for us to strive for him and only him. This is

the basic concept in Jihad. We only strive for Allah and none other than Allah.

Allah Declares in the Qur’an.

“As for

those who strive (Jahadu) in Us (the cause of Allah), We surely guide them to

Our paths, and lo! Allah is with the good doers.” (The Holy Quran, 29:69)

When we are faced with two competing interests, it becomes

jihad to choose the right one, as the following Hadith exemplify:

“Aisha, wife of the Prophet(s) asked, ‘O Messenger of

Allah, we see jihad as the best of deeds, so shouldn’t we join it?’ He replied,

‘But the best of jihad is a perfect Hajj (pilgrimage to Makkah).'” (Sahih

Al-Bukhari, No. 2784)

At another occasion, a man asked the Prophet Muhammad(s):

“‘Should I join the jihad?’ He asked, ‘Do you have

parents?’ The man said, ‘Yes!’ The Prophet(s) said, ‘Then strive by serving

them!'” (Sahih Al-Bukhari, No. 5972)

Yet another man asked the Messenger of Allah(s):

“‘What kind of jihad is better?’ He replied, ‘A word

of truth in front of an oppressive ruler!'” (Sunan Al-Nasa’i , No. 4209)

The Messenger of Allah(s) said:

“…the Mujahid (one who carries out jihad) is he who

strives against himself for the sake of Allah, and the Muhajir (one who

emigrates) is he who abandons evil deeds and sin.” (Sahih Ibn Hibbanm, No.

4862)

ISLAM DEMANDS JUSTICE AND GOODNESS TO ALL?

Terror, in its broadest sense, is violence committed

against non-military targets for political purposes. To put it in another way,

the targets of terror are entirely innocent civilians whose only crime is, in

the eyes of terrorists, to represent “the other”.

This is an act bereft of any moral justification. This, as

in the case of murders committed by Hitler or Stalin, is a crime committed

against “mankind”.

The Qur’an is a Book revealed to people as a guide to the

true path and in this Book, God commands man to adopt good morals. This morality

is based upon concepts such as love, compassion, tolerance and mercy. God calls

all people to Islamic morals through which compassion, mercy, peace and

tolerance can be experienced all over the world:

You who believe! Enter absolutely into peace (Islam). Do

not follow in the footsteps of Satan. He is an outright enemy to you.

The values of the Qur’an hold a Muslim responsible for

treating all people, whether Muslim or non-Muslim, kindly and justly, protecting

the needy and the innocent and preventing the “dissemination of

mischief”. Mischief comprises all forms of anarchy and terror that remove

security, comfort and peace. As God says in a verse,

“God does not love

mischief makers”. (Surat al-Qasas: 77).

ISLAM A SOURCE OF PEACE FOR ALL?

The word Islam has the same meaning as “peace” in

Arabic. Islam is a religion that came down to offer humanity a life filled with

the peace and well-being in which God’s eternal mercy and compassion is

manifested in the world. God invites all people to accept the moral teachings of

the Qur’an as a model whereby mercy, compassion, tolerance and peace may be

experienced in the world. In Surat al-Baqara verse 208, this command is given:

You who believe! Enter absolutely into peace (Islam). Do

not follow in the footsteps of Satan. He is an outright enemy to you.

As we see in this verse, people will experience well-being

and happiness by living according to the moral teaching of the Qur’an.

FINAL THOUGHT

Although one may have the worst view towards Islam. one

must understand the full context of Jihad. Jihad can be treated is if it were

some object that has misconceptions thrown at it. However Jihad was and is a

tool for muslims to use as a guide, to show us out of the way of ridicule. Moiz

Amjad puts it best:

It is obvious that Qitaal (or Jihad) invariably results in

the loss of lives and property. Taking a human life or even giving life is not a

trivial matter. If any of our decision entails even the possibility of taking a

human life (as would obviously be the case in declaring war), especially in the

name of Islam, we must at least have a clear permission of our Lord to take life

for the particular purpose for which we are declaring that war. Without such

clear permission, it is quite possible that our decision may not be correct and,

if that is indeed the case, we are held responsible for all the loss of life and

property that occurs consequent upon our decision. We must keep in mind that,

according to the Qur’an, taking even one life for a cause not authorized by God

shall follow the same consequence as that of killing the whole of mankind. The

Qur’an has clearly declared:

Whoever killed even a single soul – except being a

punishment of murder or that of spreading unrest in the land – is as if he

killed the whole of mankind. (Al-Maaidah 5: 32)

Latest News

Scroll to Top